標題:
poss.dd藏毒案件
發問:
最佳解答:
No. Because in order to do so, the police must prove that the person possess the ketamine. With the burden of proof falls to the police, the police can't charge anyone of you because the police can only prove the owner possess the place, which make him also own the drug as well (You can't say a sofa in his house is yours.) However, as a reminder, if the owner is not the actual owner, he may already violated obstruction of justice already.
其他解答:
poss.dd藏毒案件
發問:
此文章來自奇摩知識+如有不便請留言告知
如果成班人係屋入面玩緊,突然有差人爆門係屋主間房搵到10gk仔(當然全部人比人拉哂),而屋主認哂d野係自己,對我地會唔會有幫忙?如果冇人肯認右會有咩唔同,會唔會告哂所有人poss.dd? remark: 而家屋主是認了,其他人都以1000保左出黎,屋主唔比保(有噹噹).. 之前聽人講,幾個人係車度,係部車度搵到dd,結果成衰哂,衰唔哂都有排攪右要驗果樣驗呢樣(我地係屋就咩都唔洗驗), 想問下屋同車係法律觀點方面有咩唔同定係一樣?最佳解答:
No. Because in order to do so, the police must prove that the person possess the ketamine. With the burden of proof falls to the police, the police can't charge anyone of you because the police can only prove the owner possess the place, which make him also own the drug as well (You can't say a sofa in his house is yours.) However, as a reminder, if the owner is not the actual owner, he may already violated obstruction of justice already.
其他解答:
文章標籤
全站熱搜
留言列表
